Electronic warfare assets were long associated with stationary complexes that are deployed at defined positions and provide constant cover for a specific sector. Such an approach was effective for the defense of rear objects, command posts, and fortified areas.

However, the active development of FPV drones, reconnaissance UAVs, and precision strike assets has changed the nature of threats. Stationary EW systems increasingly become predictable targets, and the rapid change of the situation on the battlefield requires more flexible and maneuverable solutions.

Limitations of Stationary EW Systems in Modern Battle

Stationary EW systems form clearly defined coverage zones that remain relatively unchanged after deployment. This ensures a stable level of protection but at the same time makes such complexes predictable for the enemy. After the position is detected, a stationary EW system can become a target for artillery, kamikaze drones, or precision weapons.

Another limitation is low adaptability. A stationary system is not able to promptly change its location in response to a change in the direction of attack or the maneuver of one’s own units. As a result, even a technically powerful complex can lose effectiveness if the threat goes beyond its zone of influence.

In dynamic combat conditions, these factors substantially reduce the real value of the stationary format.

The Concept of a Mobile EW Group and the Principles of Its Operation

A mobile EW group is not just an EW system installed on transport. This is about a tactical unit that combines suppression assets, transport, autonomous power supply, and trained personnel capable of quickly changing positions.

The key principle of operation is maneuverability and the variability of application modes. Mobile EW groups do not work in a constant mode from one point but use short activations and the frequent change of location. This complicates detection by the enemy’s electronic reconnaissance assets and reduces the risk of targeted engagement.

Thus, the concept of a mobile EW group is based not on the continuous cover of a territory but on a point-targeted and timely impact on a threat.

Tasks of Mobile EW Complexes on the Battlefield

Mobile EW groups carry out tasks that are difficult or impossible to implement with stationary systems. First of all, this is covering units during movement, escorting equipment, and strengthening protection on threatening directions and temporary positions.

Such groups can promptly advance into the area of activity of the enemy’s FPV drones, block control channels, and leave the position before the enemy manages to correct fire or change tactics. In offensive operations, mobile complexes make it possible to reduce the effectiveness of aerial reconnaissance without lengthy deployment.

Practical approaches to using mobile formats, in particular against FPV drones in the zone of active combat operations, are examined in detail in the article: «The tactics of using EW against FPV drones in modern warfare», which is based on real combat experience.

The Speed of Movement and Deployment of Mobile EW Groups

One of the key advantages of mobile EW groups is the minimal deployment time. Unlike stationary systems, which require the preparation of a position, the mounting of antennas, and lengthy configuration, mobile complexes can come into operation almost immediately after stopping.

Rapid movement makes it possible to change the points of impact, form unpredictable suppression zones, and avoid repetitive patterns of operation. This is especially important in conditions when the enemy actively uses electronic reconnaissance assets to search for radiation sources. It is precisely speed and variability that make mobile EW groups an effective tool of maneuverable battle.

Risks of the Mobile Format of EW Application

Despite the obvious advantages, the mobile format also has its limitations. The operation of such groups depends on the technical condition of the transport, the stability of the power supply, and logistical support. A breakdown of the vehicle or problems with the power supply can temporarily put the system out of operation.

In addition, mobile EW groups require a high level of personnel training. Operators must quickly assess the situation, change operating modes, and coordinate actions with other units. Without clear procedures and well-coordinated interaction, the mobile format can lose its tactical advantages.

Therefore, the effectiveness of mobile EW solutions directly depends on the organization and training of personnel.

When Mobile EW Solutions Are Critically Necessary

Mobile EW groups become critically necessary in conditions of active combat operations, frequent movements of units, and the constant change of the tactical situation. They are indispensable during the escort of convoys, the rotation of personnel, evacuation, and maneuver operations.

In situations when a stationary complex cannot be deployed or quickly becomes a vulnerable target, mobile solutions provide temporary but effective protection. For such tasks, specialized vehicle complexes adapted for operation on the move are used.

An example of such a solution is the mobile EW complex “Hrets” 5ML for vehicles — a multi-band signal-suppression asset integrated into a transport platform. The complex is intended for the prompt cover of units during movement and at temporary positions, works autonomously, and does not require stationary deployment. It is precisely such systems that make it possible to reduce vulnerability to FPV drones in dynamic combat conditions.

Conclusions

Mobile EW groups do not fully replace stationary systems but substantially expand the capabilities of units in modern maneuverable battle. Their key advantages are speed, maneuverability, and the ability to adapt to changes in threats.

The effective use of EW today is based on the combination of different formats with a clear understanding of their limitations and strengths. It is precisely such an approach that makes it possible to reduce the vulnerability of units and increase resistance to drone threats.